A If Not P, Part II

Part of the reason sellers may not take us seriously as buyers [Eeny, Report, Cultural (What can I say, it’s an ongoing issue.)] is that we don’t futz around. Once we’ve seen enough to know this horse is not coming home with us, we make nice-nice noises and leave.

For the horse shopping visit last weekend [A/P], we spent perhaps 20 minutes at the barn. Most of those minutes were on the order of confirming our initial decision. As soon as I looked over his withers, I was 99% sure this was not the right horse. My eye level is exactly 16h. If I can look over the withers, the horse ain’t 16.1h, no matter what the ad says.

Still, I was willing to admit the possibility that he would change my mind. After all, Charisma was “this little, fat, black pony” the first time Mark Todd saw him. We watched our possible purchase walk, trot, canter, and jump one fence. Red flags fluttered. We said thank you. I didn’t ride the horse. I never put on my britches. What is the point of making the horse work or of disconveniencing owner any longer than necessary?

We’ve been doing this a while, longer than Possible Purchase plus his rider have been alive, by almost a factor of two, for each one of us. We have learned what we like. We might be right. We might be wrong. We are definitely decisive.

Horse evaluating is akin to chicken sexing. It’s a complicated mix of factors but do it long enough and you get mighty fast at it.

How long does it take you to size up a horse?
Am I going too fast & possibly missing a wunderkind?

Prior horse shopping posts.

Activity If Not Progress

We looked at a horse over the weekend. Go us.

The Downsides
The owners would rather lease than sell. As a result, the price was, shall we say, optimistic.

Too short. He might have made the advertised height if you mohawked his mane. This is a problem as I am no longer skinny enough to look good on little ones. I look okay on Mathilda, but she’s a doublewide.

A few mannerisms that could have been greenness or could have been a problem needed further investigation.

He was a cute enough with a nice, if stubborn, look in his eye. I got no problem with attitude. Previous Horse exuded ‘tude. However, the rest of the package was unexciting to me.

The Upside
I finally figured out what I want to see when I go look at a horse. I want a horse who knocks my socks off. Socklessness is not necessarily a result of flash. I have been enchanted by a chunky Quarter Horse [Moses Delivered a Gift] and a curmudgeonly cart horse [“Just George”, Horse Illustrated, February 2011]. In short, I want to see a horse who makes me think, ‘Yes, this is gonna be fun.’

Life is too short to ride uninteresting horses.

Prior horse shopping posts.

Pay It Forward

I have taken up the challenge issued by Halt, Salute and . . . to Creative Pay it Forward:

The first five people to comment on this post will receive a gift from me sometime this calender year! … The catch is you must make the same offer on your own page …. Offer applies worldwide – I will post anywhere! … To keep it simple, I’ll Pay it Forward for the first five comments on this blog – not on my Facebook page, Twitter account or on Haynet.

Anyway, let’s have some craic with this!

Rodney’s Saga Rewards might consist of
* A nice print if I struck it lucky with a photo this year.
* A bibelot at the intersection of LEGO and horses (I just finished four days of BrickFair).
* Ditto books and horses.
* A Spotted of your own, particularly if you live somewhere exotic relative to me (Eastern US) and are likely to retaliate with a Spotted At … photo.

Craic – Not what you think. Explanation from The CRAIC is Mighty, complete with T-shirt:

The Irish keep talking about craic – but have a tough time defining it. …. I would say the essence of craic is in the talk and banter of good company, a group of people getting together to have a laugh and most of all to take a break from being serious about life.

,,, or being serious about our blogs.

So, the first five to comment right here AND post a similar offer on their blog will receive an item of dubious but amusing value.

I will ponder a similar offer for nonblogging readers for the future.

No Name-Calling Week

No Name-Calling Week, January 21-25, 2013

No Name-Calling Week is an annual week of educational activities aimed at ending name-calling of all kinds and providing schools with the tools and inspiration to launch an on-going dialogue about ways to eliminate bullying in their communities.

Since I am way out of school and have no kids or grandkids to fuss about, I will attempt to speak nicely to Rodney & the other four-legged critters. Unfortunately, we have taken to referring to Rodney as Dimwit. He’s curious, brave, and interested in his environment. However, once he accumulates all this data, he doesn’t seem to know what to do with it. He cannot, so far, take 1 and 1 and arrive at 2. We’re talking normal horse math here, not quadratic equations. Plus, when asked to synthesize, he has a tendency to take 1 and 1 and arrive at The Sky Is Falling. The resulting ignorance and hysteria leads us to treat him dismissively. But not for this week.

Of course, Rodney doesn’t care what mouth noises we make around him. He cares about tone. However, words affect thought affect action. So, if I speak dismissively and impatiently, guess how I am going to treat him. And then we’re back to The Sky is Falling.

Who do you need to handle more gently in speech?

(NNCW found from a banner ad on Unshelved, a library comic.)

BrickFair: day 3 – Girls & Horses

Friends sets

Because girls won’t play with an engineering toy unless it’s pink and comes with dolls & horsies, right? Sadly – for those of us who believe in individuality over cultural stereotypes – it appears to be working.

Of course I bought them. I’ll part them out. The colors are AMAZING.

For more erudite commentary on the subject, see Jennifer Garlen’s Virtual Virago: Gendered Consumption, Girls, and LEGO Friends.

More LEGO posts
BrickFair site